Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Latest Threads
Expanded Torpedos
by thevraad
04-18-2024, 09:18 PM
DSCR - Damage Reduction
by thevraad
12-22-2023, 05:03 PM
Karpav's Painting Blog (r...
by thevraad
10-30-2023, 03:08 PM
Deconstructing the Ship C...
by thevraad
10-27-2023, 03:39 PM
Order Issues
by thevraad
10-27-2023, 03:09 PM
Strange Object Imaged in ...
by thevraad
10-27-2023, 03:02 PM
That one source of Star S...
by Smurf
10-17-2023, 11:17 AM
The Dumbo
by Karelian Suomi
10-16-2023, 11:41 PM
Smurf's New Style of Rule...
by Smurf
09-30-2023, 04:31 PM
Complaint about postage
by Karelian Suomi
09-01-2023, 08:11 PM

 
Forum Statistics

Members: 66,   Latest member: MrFixIt,   Forum threads: 172,   Forum posts: 847,   Full Statistics


Question New Order, no request for payment?
Posted by: Black Guard - 07-17-2019, 11:47 PM - Forum: Website and Forum Feedback - Replies (2)

I've already posted this in another thread, but here it is again:

I've recently placed an order as well. Got an order number, but no bill. It says; "Check payments," for payment method. Am I supposed to mail a check to whomever? I was never prompted to actually provide real information for a payment, yet my billing address is listed as well. Is there some kind of back-log? Do I need to contact someone else to get a payment through?

Print this item

  Solar Worm
Posted by: Gimgamgoo - 07-13-2019, 08:55 AM - Forum: The Shipyard - Replies (1)

I see TTCombat have picked up the license to make a board game of the Stellaris PC game. I think I'd rather play it on the PC to be fair, however, they did show off a render of the Ether Drake. A Solar Worm like entitiy in Stellaris.

The images they released show no scale at all, so it could be way too big for us Silent Death gamers, but if it's the right size, it could make a nice alternate Solar Worm model.


[Image: Ether%20Drake_zpsls7huc56.jpg]

Print this item

  Plastic Missiles/torpedos/asteroids Re-print?
Posted by: Black Guard - 07-10-2019, 11:38 PM - Forum: Website and Forum Feedback - Replies (2)

So, currently, on ebay there is a large set of the old plastic missile/torpedo counters that were originally included in the Delux Edition of the game. Seeing that you guys have the plastic ships for sale as well; I was wondering if I got said counters, then sent them to whoever does the plastic ships, then maybe you could start selling those again?
I was kinda bumed-out when I got the boxed set and it only had the paper counters. Maybe these would help out?

Print this item

  Forum looks weird
Posted by: Brother Jim - 07-09-2019, 03:36 AM - Forum: Website and Forum Feedback - Replies (11)

For a while now the forum has looked weird to me, it almost looks like it isn't loading completely.
Below is a screenshot of what it looks like.



Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
Print this item

  Optional Rules [adopted]
Posted by: Smurf - 06-25-2019, 09:50 AM - Forum: The Wardroom - No Replies

Please do not use this thread to discuss Optional Rules.  Instead use the Optional Rules [Discussion Thread] and once discussed we can add or edit posts in this Thread.

Turn Sequence

Beginning Phase

  • Launch and Lock on
  • Initiative Rolls 
  • Movement phase
Main Phase
  • Torp resolution phase
  • Cannon Fire phase
  • Missile resolution phase
End Phase
  • Drift 
  • Damage Control

Initiative Rolls:  Based on the Pilot Skill as the Gunnery Die (SD49).
Skill
1-4= 1D4
5-6= 1D6
7-8- 1D8
9-10= 1D10

Point Defence: can be used both Torps and Missiles in the same turn.

Example: PD 1-7(6) is facing 2 torps and 2 ML packs.  4 attempts can be made against the Torps and the remaining 2 against the MLs.  PD attempts against MLs have to be made in the Missile phase and therefore any critical hits may have reduced the PD attempts.

Drift:  If using asteroids the asteroids move first

Damage Control used at end of turn.

Print this item

  Optional Rules [Discussion]
Posted by: Smurf - 06-25-2019, 09:47 AM - Forum: The Wardroom - Replies (3)

Another Forumite asked to have a pdf/place for optional rules.

I have forwarded these Optional Rules:

Initiative Rolls:  Based on the Pilot Tight Turn Die.


Drift moved to end of Turn (Play tested and enjoyed)

Damage Control used at end of turn (after Drift) regardless of being being hit etc (reason, Warhounds can, why not the rest with less effective DCs, playtest was good).  If using asteroids the asteroids move first.

Point Defence can be used both Torps and Missiles in the same turn.  (playtest went well, most ships choose either or due to limitations but those with a big enough spread should be able to knock out 2 torps and 2 ML packs, NB:  PD can be used as many times as required to shoot down torps but only 1 attempt to shoot down an ML pack)

Example: PD 1-7(6) is facing 2 torps and 2 ML packs.  4 attempts can be made against the Torps and the remaining 2 against the MLs.  PD attempts against MLs have to be made in the Missile phase and therefore any critical hits may have reduced the PD attempts.

Turn Sequence
Beginning Phase

  • Launch and Lock on
  • Initiative Rolls 
  • Movement phase
Main Phase
  • Torp resolution phase
  • Cannon Fire phase
  • Missile resolution phase
End Phase
  • Drift 
  • Damage Control

Weapon errata:

Plasma Cannon's malfunction to be either cannot fire for a turn or must be fixed by a successful Damage Control Roll?

Cannons with magazines do not have to pay points for extra ammo, just slots, it is the cannon that does the damage?

Escort sized weaponry (Crewed Cannons) have a -5 to hit non Escort sized ships?

Print this item

  I have got new goodies
Posted by: Smurf - 06-18-2019, 11:04 PM - Forum: Shopper's Guide - Replies (3)

I thought my order fell through.

But today I got a bag of goodies.

Now I want to design a new MPAC!

Print this item

  MPACS - Gunboats
Posted by: Smurf - 06-06-2019, 11:08 PM - Forum: The Wardroom - Replies (3)

It's nice to have a big friend but not all of them are that great.

Eppring Prime
It's cheap, It's easy to hit, it's a wonder why you put it on the field.  Apart from the various MLs there is no real reason to take this ship apart from desperation.

Eppring
Well it's an improvement on the Prime.

Eppring Alpha
This I think is the better version.  The weapon layout packs more punch at least.

Spider
If there was ever an interwar years for gunboats then the Spider represents this.    It is not great in speed, defence nor firepower.  

Conestoga
It looks impressive but 4 of the weapons are questionable: Railrepeater (x2), Portobolt Projector and a Minigun.

Star Raven
I like it.  Not great but it has a good weapon layout, decent torps, and an ML.  The Alpha version is even better.

Drakar
A nice look but it does have that early critical hit.

Betafortress
Despite the Alpha and Beta Versions the original is best for its hyperdrive.  The extra weapon and crew just add more costs.  With a compliment of various forms of firepower, it come with 2 MLs and 15Torps!

Print this item

  URGENT TRANSMISSION FROM THE FRONTIER!!! IT’S A MEMORIAL DAY WEEKEND SALE!!!!
Posted by: Karpav1 - 05-27-2019, 12:26 AM - Forum: MX News and Discussion - Replies (2)

[Image: uweQKrk.png]



Yippee! Data Sphere, Kashmere, & most all of Operation Drydock II will enter my personal rusty, dusty hangar- except for Tokugawa & Unkulunkulu which are a couple of the factions I have on the back burner for now.

I've had Hibernia on the backburner too, but omg- that brooch find...[Image: iE6MB5o.png]
...best scratch-bash evah!
I can envision the ground crews fueling up the Executioners to join this behemoth. Careful with that Lion's Roar Ultra-Heavy Plazgun... the clutch worlds slumber only so deep! Seriously though, you've completed the concept art for the Hibernian Freehold book- just arrange the elements and pop in a background for a photo cover, or digitally brush over the image for a painterly look and DONE. Excellent as always, and consistently outdoing yourself. Image of the year contender (and eventual winner).

Print this item

  Playtest Check Station
Posted by: Karpav1 - 05-03-2019, 10:50 AM - Forum: Night Brood 2.0 - Replies (4)

Night Brood feedback:

  • The Frenzy Rules- didn't bother using them last game (once I finally remembered at the start of turn 2 that we'd forgotten to implement it) because the rule is just one more plate in the air to remember & it either slows down play unless you place a reminder marker make a note on the sheet or makes movement predictable. It hasn't been needed to nerf the Brood thus far in my hands at least...
  • Ammo for beams -needs to go- it threatens to hinder the flow of the game: "Excuse me, I'll be taking this turn to run away so I can try to regenerate more ammo", even though it hasn't come up in practice (the ships rip apart or lose their weapons altogether before they get 4 turns worth of shots in), the concept isn't growing on me well. If the ranges had been kept long, sure, it makes sense. With ranges cut back, you have to get into a knife fight with ships and that usually results in jump pods falling off the frame like a tipped Mellon cart. Regenerate every turn? Why slow the game down with the extra rolling and forgo the ammo in the first place because if you fail to regenerate you are back to running anyway. Leeches and Spore Moles need ammo -Beams don't.
  • Gammas are a mixed bag. Fast, small ships with DV's on their best days that's easier to hit than most gunboats and warhounds. Their X-Beams miss often locked down to a D4 ADB die but do solid damage sometimes when they do connect. I'd be funny if they were cheap & disposable, but attrition fighters they are not. They'll probably need some kind of push before it's all said and done, even if it's a slow titration of their points value.
  • The -2 penalty to shoot when jump pods are used is another one of those easy to forget rules that don't seem to be needed at the moment because the brood ship is either using the pods to A) escape, so isn't concerned with firing anyway, B) get in an advantageous position to shoot in which spending the limited resource only to have the advantage dulled somewhat defeats the purpose of chasing the advantage. (at least in my games thus far- it can be tricky enough to get a shot to hit with 3d8 without the penalty), or C) Shaking off torpedos from a tracking pack. Coupled with the aforementioned D4 ADB Gamma issue, it becomes Sophie's Choice of- "Do you want to eat 4xMk.10's this turn... or not hit anything, but waste 1 of your 2 remaining shots trying when Regeneration 2 is your fallback to resupply?"
  • Beam Ranges being clipped have had the effect of making pinning down ships with mid to plus-sized drones nigh moot. No more is there a long-range zone to safe-ish-ly shoot at ships stuck in the drone-quagmire for a couple of turns. If an Alpha or Beta is in range to shoot now, then so are the ships they are shooting at in most cases --they can just min. move, shoot back, drones be damned. Drones nuisance trick falls flat without a shooting pressure advantage, but with beam ranges as they are drones no longer trap ships for time-at-range raking. There's no advantage to press with stuck ships that are equally effective at range.[Image: g3jL6PS.png]
It's safe to say I've not yet hit a stride with the new brood. I believe they have the tools already to do well, with enough board space and time. The trouble I'm having is making them work in a 4-6 turn game with a closed-border play area. In that arena, I'm finding them a tough proposition to hit parity as I'm having them crumple rapidly. If the old Brood were a 9 to the Imperial Houses 7, this iteration feels like a 5.5 on the grid. That's not saying much- my luck and dodgy play with only 3 games in could make for enough margin of error to account for the slack. That's my thoughts so far anyway.

Print this item

Online Users
There are currently 9 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 7 Guest(s)
Bing, Facebook

User Panel

Welcome guest, not a member yet?

Why not sign up today and start posting on out community forums.


  Register

Navigation


Latest Topics

Forum software by © MyBB 1.8.26 Theme © iAndrew 2016